Harlow & Milner Ltd v Teasdale

Harlow & Milner Ltd v Teasdale

The Defendant’s alleged defences (defective work, unfairness, risk of non-repayment) do not constitute valid grounds to resist summary enforcement of the adjudicator’s decision; the Claimant is entitled to judgment, interest, and indemnity costs. No order is made as to costs of the bankruptcy proceedings as both parties contributed to their necessity.

Parties
Claimant: Harlow & Milner Ltd.; Defendant: Linda Teasdale
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment and Costs
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the Claimant; costs awarded on indemnity basis; no order as to costs of bankruptcy proceedings.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Summary Judgment, Costs, Bankruptcy Proceedings
Construction Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Summary Judgment Costs Bankruptcy Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harlow & Milner Ltd.

Claimant

Linda Teasdale

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision should be summarily enforced
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant has a valid defence to enforcement
  3. 3 Entitlement to costs of enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant’s alleged defences (defective work, unfairness, risk of non-repayment) do not constitute valid grounds to resist summary enforcement of the adjudicator’s decision; the Claimant is entitled to judgment, interest, and indemnity costs. No order is made as to costs of the bankruptcy proceedings as both parties contributed to their necessity.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the Claimant; costs awarded on indemnity basis; no order as to costs of bankruptcy proceedings.

Orders

  • Judgment for Claimant in the sum of £95,024.85 (including interest) to be paid by 13th February 2006.
  • Defendant to pay Claimant’s enforcement costs assessed at £9,000 by 13th February 2006.