Lisa Smith v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities & Anor.
The exclusion of permanently non-nomadic Gypsies and Travellers from the planning definition in PPTS 2015 amounted to unjustified indirect discrimination on grounds of age, disability, and race/ethnicity. The Secretary of State failed to demonstrate a legitimate aim supported by evidence, and the harsh effects of the exclusion were not outweighed by any substantiated policy objective. The inspector's decision was vitiated by reliance on this discriminatory policy and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lisa Smith; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities; Second Respondent: North West Leicestershire District Council; Interested Party: Amos Willshore; Intervener: Derbyshire Gypsy Liaison Group; Intervener: Friends Families and Travellers; Intervener: London Gypsies and Travellers; Intervener: Southwark Travellers Action Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (appeal From High Court) / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; inspector’s decision quashed; matter remitted for redetermination.
- Legal Topics
- Indirect Discrimination, Justification of Discrimination, Planning Policy for Gypsies and Travellers, Equality Act 2010, Article 8 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR, Public Sector Equality Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lisa Smith
Appellant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities
First Respondent
North West Leicestershire District Council
Second Respondent
Amos Willshore
Interested Party
Derbyshire Gypsy Liaison Group
Intervener
Friends Families and Travellers
Intervener
London Gypsies and Travellers
Intervener
Southwark Travellers Action Group
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (appeal From High Court) / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exclusion of permanently non-nomadic Gypsies and Travellers from the planning definition in PPTS 2015 is unlawfully discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010 and the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State justified the admitted indirect discrimination on grounds of age, disability, and race/ethnicity
- 3 Whether the inspector's decision was vitiated by reliance on the discriminatory policy
Ratio Decidendi
The exclusion of permanently non-nomadic Gypsies and Travellers from the planning definition in PPTS 2015 amounted to unjustified indirect discrimination on grounds of age, disability, and race/ethnicity. The Secretary of State failed to demonstrate a legitimate aim supported by evidence, and the harsh effects of the exclusion were not outweighed by any substantiated policy objective. The inspector's decision was vitiated by reliance on this discriminatory policy and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; inspector’s decision quashed; matter remitted for redetermination.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The inspector’s decision of 23 November 2018 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment