Domblides v Listing Officer (Rev 1)

Domblides v Listing Officer (Rev 1)

The appeal was dismissed because the tribunal did not err in law: it was not required to determine a specific value for the property, was entitled to rely on previous tribunal decisions and the tone of the list, and was justified in finding the claimant's indexation evidence insufficient. The tribunal's decision was...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Domblides; Defendant: Listing Officer
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Council Tax Valuation, Valuation Bands, Appeals on Questions of Law, Costs Orders
Administrative Law Local Government Law Tax Law Council Tax Valuation Valuation Bands Appeals on Questions of Law Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Domblides

Claimant

Listing Officer

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the Valuation Tribunal erred in law in upholding the council tax banding of the claimant's property
  2. 2 Whether the Listing Officer was required to provide a specific valuation for the property
  3. 3 Whether reliance on previous tribunal decisions and the 'tone of the list' was lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the tribunal did not err in law: it was not required to determine a specific value for the property, was entitled to rely on previous tribunal decisions and the tone of the list, and was justified in finding the claimant's indexation evidence insufficient. The tribunal's decision was not perverse and the burden of proof lay with the appellant, which was not discharged.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Decision of the Wiltshire Valuation Tribunal of 17 September 2007 confirmed