Domblides v Listing Officer (Rev 1)
The appeal was dismissed because the tribunal did not err in law: it was not required to determine a specific value for the property, was entitled to rely on previous tribunal decisions and the tone of the list, and was justified in finding the claimant's indexation evidence insufficient. The tribunal's decision was...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Domblides; Defendant: Listing Officer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Council Tax Valuation, Valuation Bands, Appeals on Questions of Law, Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Domblides
Claimant
Listing Officer
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Valuation Tribunal erred in law in upholding the council tax banding of the claimant's property
- 2 Whether the Listing Officer was required to provide a specific valuation for the property
- 3 Whether reliance on previous tribunal decisions and the 'tone of the list' was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the tribunal did not err in law: it was not required to determine a specific value for the property, was entitled to rely on previous tribunal decisions and the tone of the list, and was justified in finding the claimant's indexation evidence insufficient. The tribunal's decision was not perverse and the burden of proof lay with the appellant, which was not discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Wiltshire Valuation Tribunal of 17 September 2007 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment