Palmali Shipping SA v Litasco SA

Palmali Shipping SA v Litasco SA

Palmali's current quantification of its loss of profits claim is unsustainable as a matter of law because it fails to account for real inter-company liabilities to ship-owning companies. Palmali cannot recover losses suffered by related companies under the transferred loss principle, as the contract's object was not to benefit those companies. Permission to amend to plead a claim for damages for breach of the Minimum Quantity Obligation is granted, but Palmali must plead a coherent and detailed methodology for any further amendments.

Parties
Claimant: Palmali Shipping SA; Defendant: Litasco SA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Interlocutory Applications (summary Judgment and Permission to Amend Pleadings)
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in part; permission to amend granted in part; trial date vacated
Legal Topics
Damages for Breach of Contract, Summary Judgment, Amendment of Pleadings, Transferred Loss, Net Loss Calculation
Contract Law Commercial Law Damages for Breach of Contract Summary Judgment Amendment of Pleadings Transferred Loss Net Loss Calculation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Palmali Shipping SA

Claimant

Litasco SA

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Interlocutory Applications (summary Judgment and Permission to Amend Pleadings)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Palmali's quantification of loss of profits claim is legally viable given inter-company liabilities
  2. 2 Whether Palmali can amend its pleadings to claim damages for breach of the Minimum Quantity Obligation
  3. 3 Whether Palmali can recover losses suffered by related ship-owning companies under the transferred loss principle

Ratio Decidendi

Palmali's current quantification of its loss of profits claim is unsustainable as a matter of law because it fails to account for real inter-company liabilities to ship-owning companies. Palmali cannot recover losses suffered by related companies under the transferred loss principle, as the contract's object was not to benefit those companies. Permission to amend to plead a claim for damages for breach of the Minimum Quantity Obligation is granted, but Palmali must plead a coherent and detailed methodology for any further amendments.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted in part; permission to amend granted in part; trial date vacated

Orders

  • Palmali's current quantification of loss of profits claim struck out or summarily determined against it
  • Permission granted to Palmali to amend pleadings to claim damages for breach of the Minimum Quantity Obligation, subject to further detailed amendment