Equitable Law Capital, Re
David Clarkson was a de facto director of ELC, centrally involved in its fraudulent operation, and knowingly participated in fraudulent trading, wrongful trading, breach of duty, and receipt of payments at an undervalue, making him liable for those claims. The claims against Mr Flaton, Mr Arnison, and Belmonte failed as the court found no dishonesty or blind-eye knowledge on their part. The Milner Settlement Agreement did not preclude claims against the remaining respondents, as a term permitting continuation of those claims was implied by necessity and context. Payments to David Clarkson were at an undervalue as he provided no real consideration for the sums received.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lloyd Christopher Biscoe; Applicant: Louise Donna Baxter; Applicant: Equitable Law Capital Limited; Respondent: Graham William Milner; Respondent: Lillian Marie Milner; Respondent: William David Clarkson; Respondent: Paul Clarkson; Respondent: Anthony Flaton; Respondent: Belmonte Limited; Respondent: Richard Arnison; Respondent: Eiger Litigation Management Limited; Respondent: Carole Clarkson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency/company Law Application / Post Trial Judgment (liability and Findings, Relief to Be Determined at Further Hearing)
- Outcome
- Claims against David Clarkson succeed; claims against Mr Flaton, Mr Arnison, and Belmonte fail; Milner Settlement Agreement does not bar claims against remaining respondents; relief to be determined at further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Trading, Wrongful Trading, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dishonest Assistance, Transactions at an Undervalue, Constructive Trust, Settlement Agreements, Directors' Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyd Christopher Biscoe
Applicant
Louise Donna Baxter
Applicant
Equitable Law Capital Limited
Applicant
Graham William Milner
Respondent
Lillian Marie Milner
Respondent
William David Clarkson
Respondent
Paul Clarkson
Respondent
Anthony Flaton
Respondent
Belmonte Limited
Respondent
Richard Arnison
Respondent
Eiger Litigation Management Limited
Respondent
Carole Clarkson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/company Law Application / Post Trial Judgment (liability and Findings, Relief to Be Determined at Further Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether David Clarkson was a de facto director of ELC and liable for fraudulent trading, wrongful trading, breach of duty, transactions at an undervalue, and as a constructive trustee; Whether Mr Flaton, Mr Arnison, and Belmonte were liable for dishonest assistance, fraudulent trading, or transactions at an undervalue; Whether the Milner Settlement Agreement precluded claims against remaining respondents; Whether payments to respondents were transactions at an undervalue; Whether the Scheme was fraudulent from inception; Whether the Brochure contained fraudulent misrepresentations and who was responsible
Ratio Decidendi
David Clarkson was a de facto director of ELC, centrally involved in its fraudulent operation, and knowingly participated in fraudulent trading, wrongful trading, breach of duty, and receipt of payments at an undervalue, making him liable for those claims. The claims against Mr Flaton, Mr Arnison, and Belmonte failed as the court found no dishonesty or blind-eye knowledge on their part. The Milner Settlement Agreement did not preclude claims against the remaining respondents, as a term permitting continuation of those claims was implied by necessity and context. Payments to David Clarkson were at an undervalue as he provided no real consideration for the sums received.
Court Disposition
Claims against David Clarkson succeed; claims against Mr Flaton, Mr Arnison, and Belmonte fail; Milner Settlement Agreement does not bar claims against remaining respondents; relief to be determined at further hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment