LLOYD HINTON v GILLIAN WOTHERSPOON
It was not proved on the balance of probability that Mr Wotherspoon entered into the 2008 transfer for the prohibited purpose of defrauding creditors. The release of the Restriction in 2013 was not a transaction at an undervalue. Mrs Wotherspoon became sole legal and beneficial owner in 2008. The application is dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lloyd Hinton; Bankrupt: John Wotherspoon; Respondent: Gillian Wotherspoon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transaction at Undervalue, Beneficial Ownership, Fraudulent Conveyance, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Section 423 Insolvency Act, Section 339 Insolvency Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyd Hinton
Applicant
John Wotherspoon
Bankrupt
Gillian Wotherspoon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Did Mr Wotherspoon hold a beneficial interest in Strand House at the time of its sale in 2013?
- 2 Was the 2008 transfer of Strand House to Mrs Wotherspoon a transaction defrauding creditors under section 423 IA?
- 3 Was the release of the Restriction in 2013 a transaction at an undervalue under section 339 IA?
Ratio Decidendi
It was not proved on the balance of probability that Mr Wotherspoon entered into the 2008 transfer for the prohibited purpose of defrauding creditors. The release of the Restriction in 2013 was not a transaction at an undervalue. Mrs Wotherspoon became sole legal and beneficial owner in 2008. The application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Wotherspoon confirmed as sole legal and beneficial owner of Strand House
- No relief under section 423 or section 339 IA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment