LM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor
The First-tier Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasoning and findings of fact regarding the provision of overnight care by the second respondent, constituting an error of law. The decision is set aside and remitted for reconsideration by a new tribunal.
- Parties
- Appellant: LM; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Second Respondent: NO
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and case remitted for rehearing by a new tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Child Support, Shared Care, Tribunal Procedure, Anonymity Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LM
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
First Respondent
NO
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law in its determination of shared care reduction under the Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012
- 2 Whether the second respondent qualifies as a non-resident parent under the Child Support Act 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasoning and findings of fact regarding the provision of overnight care by the second respondent, constituting an error of law. The decision is set aside and remitted for reconsideration by a new tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and case remitted for rehearing by a new tribunal.
Orders
- Case remitted to First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at an oral hearing.
- New tribunal must not include previous judge or financially qualified member.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment