O (A Child), Re [2002] EWCA Civ 1054 (4 July 2002)
The real and substantial risk of disruption and harm from the natural parents, who knew the foster parents' identity and location, made the prospect of a successful adoption application by Mr and Mrs S remote and contrary to the child's best interests. The judge was entitled to prioritize the child's safety and stability over the attachment to the foster parents.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1054
- Parties
- Applicants: Mr and Mrs S; Respondent: Local Authority; Prospective Adopters: Mr and Mrs D; Child: A S O
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Care Orders, Foster Care, Risk Assessment, Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs S
Applicants
Local Authority
Respondent
Mr and Mrs D
Prospective Adopters
A S O
Child
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether foster parents should be granted permission to adopt a child in their care despite risks posed by natural parents
- 2 Whether the risk of disruption by natural parents outweighs the child's attachment to foster parents
Ratio Decidendi
The real and substantial risk of disruption and harm from the natural parents, who knew the foster parents' identity and location, made the prospect of a successful adoption application by Mr and Mrs S remote and contrary to the child's best interests. The judge was entitled to prioritize the child's safety and stability over the attachment to the foster parents.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment