R and C (Adoption or Fostering), Re
The judge erred by failing to robustly analyse the advantages and disadvantages of adoption versus long-term fostering, misapplied the law regarding sibling contact, and did not properly exercise the court's power to set the contact template at the placement order stage. Adoption with court-directed sibling contact is the only option meeting the children's needs for permanence and sibling relationships.
- Parties
- Appellant: Local Authority; First Respondent: Mother; Third and Fourth Respondents: Children's Guardian (for Third and Fourth Respondents); Second Respondent: Y's Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Court, Placement Order Application
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judge's order set aside; placement orders made for both children.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Placement Orders, Sibling Contact, Parental Consent, Open Adoption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Appellant
Mother
First Respondent
Children's Guardian (for Third and Fourth Respondents)
Third and Fourth Respondents
Y's Father
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Court, Placement Order Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether placement orders should be made for two children given the need for sibling contact
- 2 Whether the judge erred in refusing placement orders based on inability to guarantee sibling contact and potential for mother's rehabilitation
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred by failing to robustly analyse the advantages and disadvantages of adoption versus long-term fostering, misapplied the law regarding sibling contact, and did not properly exercise the court's power to set the contact template at the placement order stage. Adoption with court-directed sibling contact is the only option meeting the children's needs for permanence and sibling relationships.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judge's order set aside; placement orders made for both children.
Orders
- Placement orders authorising local authority to place R and C for adoption.
- Order under s.26(2)(b) ACA 2002 requiring sibling contact six times per year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment