A, B and C (Minors), Re [2010] EWCC 37 (Fam) (2010)

A, B and C (Minors), Re [2010] EWCC 37 (Fam) (2010)

The court found the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were clearly met due to the children’s exposure to significant harm, including abuse and neglect. Care Orders were necessary and in the children’s best interests. Direct contact with mother or grandparents was not appropriate at this stage due to the children’s needs for stability and the grandparents’ lack of acceptance of the harm suffered. Indirect contact for mother and grandparents was ordered, with the requirement that contact be reviewed at each statutory review.

Citation
[2010] EWCC 37 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant: Local Authority; First Respondent: Mother of A, B and C; Second Respondent: A (Minor); Third Respondent: B (Minor); Fourth Respondent: C (Minor); Fifth Respondent: Maternal Grandfather; Sixth Respondent: Maternal Grandmother
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings Under Children Act 1989 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Care Orders made for A, B and C; indirect contact for mother and grandparents ordered; no direct contact at this stage.
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Threshold Criteria, Contact With Family, Welfare of the Child
Family Law Child Protection Care Orders Threshold Criteria Contact With Family Welfare of the Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Local Authority

Applicant

Mother of A, B and C

First Respondent

A (Minor)

Second Respondent

B (Minor)

Third Respondent

C (Minor)

Fourth Respondent

Maternal Grandfather

Fifth Respondent

Maternal Grandmother

Sixth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings Under Children Act 1989 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 are met
  2. 2 Whether Care Orders should be made for A, B and C
  3. 3 Whether direct or indirect contact should be ordered for mother and grandparents

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were clearly met due to the children’s exposure to significant harm, including abuse and neglect. Care Orders were necessary and in the children’s best interests. Direct contact with mother or grandparents was not appropriate at this stage due to the children’s needs for stability and the grandparents’ lack of acceptance of the harm suffered. Indirect contact for mother and grandparents was ordered, with the requirement that contact be reviewed at each statutory review.

Court Disposition

Care Orders made for A, B and C; indirect contact for mother and grandparents ordered; no direct contact at this stage.

Orders

  • Care Orders granted for A, B and C under section 31 Children Act 1989.
  • Children to remain in long-term foster care placements as per amended care plans.