A & B (Children), Re [2021] EWFC B28 (31 March 2021)
The court found that the threshold for care orders was met for both children due to significant harm arising from parental neglect, substance misuse, failure to engage with support, and, in Child A's case, the risk of sexual harm from Father B. The parents had not demonstrated sufficient change or insight. A final care order was made for both children. For Child B, a placement order was granted with a 12-month search for adopters, failing which long-term foster care would be considered. For Child A, the care order was made with recognition of her age and likely future autonomy, but overnight contact was not supported at present due to ongoing risk.
- Citation
- [2021] EWFC B28
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; Respondent/mother of Child B, Sister of Child a: Mother B; Respondent/father of Child B, Partner of Mother B: Father B; Subject Child (aged 16), Maternal Aunt of Child B, Sister of Mother B: Child A; Subject Child (aged 2 Years 5 Months), Son of Mother B and Father B: Child B; Respondent/father of Child a: Father A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (public Law) / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Final care orders granted for both children; placement order granted for Child B with 12-month search for adopters.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Placement Orders, Adoption, Parental Responsibility, Threshold Criteria, Risk of Harm, Neglect, Sexual Risk, Learning Disability, Substance Misuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
Mother B
Respondent/mother of Child B, Sister of Child a
Father B
Respondent/father of Child B, Partner of Mother B
Child A
Subject Child (aged 16), Maternal Aunt of Child B, Sister of Mother B
Child B
Subject Child (aged 2 Years 5 Months), Son of Mother B and Father B
Father A
Respondent/father of Child a
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (public Law) / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether threshold for care orders is met for Child A and Child B
- 2 Whether Father B poses a sexual risk to Child A
- 3 Whether Child B should be placed for adoption or long-term foster care
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the threshold for care orders was met for both children due to significant harm arising from parental neglect, substance misuse, failure to engage with support, and, in Child A's case, the risk of sexual harm from Father B. The parents had not demonstrated sufficient change or insight. A final care order was made for both children. For Child B, a placement order was granted with a 12-month search for adopters, failing which long-term foster care would be considered. For Child A, the care order was made with recognition of her age and likely future autonomy, but overnight contact was not supported at present due to ongoing risk.
Court Disposition
Final care orders granted for both children; placement order granted for Child B with 12-month search for adopters.
Orders
- Final care order for Child A
- Final care order for Child B
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment