F (A Child), Re (Care And Placement Orders) [2025] EWFC 309 (B) (29 July 2025)
The court found that the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were met: the parents are unable to provide safe, consistent, and adequate care for Faith, as evidenced by repeated failures with older siblings, lack of insight, minimal support network, and ongoing risks in the home. The welfare analysis concluded that Faith's welfare throughout her life requires adoption, as no other realistic option would sufficiently protect her from significant harm. Dispensing with parental consent is necessary and proportionate; nothing else will do.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 309 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; First Respondent: Sophie (Mother); Second Respondent: Will (Father); Children's Guardian: Children's Guardian (Ms Muldowney)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Care and Placement Orders (family Law) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Care and placement orders made; parental consent to adoption dispensed with.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Placement Orders, Adoption, Threshold Criteria, Welfare Principle, Parental Responsibility, Proportionality, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
Sophie (Mother)
First Respondent
Will (Father)
Second Respondent
Children's Guardian (Ms Muldowney)
Children's Guardian
Procedural Posture
Care and Placement Orders (family Law) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 are met for Faith
- 2 Whether Faith's welfare requires making care and placement orders for adoption, dispensing with parental consent
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were met: the parents are unable to provide safe, consistent, and adequate care for Faith, as evidenced by repeated failures with older siblings, lack of insight, minimal support network, and ongoing risks in the home. The welfare analysis concluded that Faith's welfare throughout her life requires adoption, as no other realistic option would sufficiently protect her from significant harm. Dispensing with parental consent is necessary and proportionate; nothing else will do.
Court Disposition
Care and placement orders made; parental consent to adoption dispensed with.
Orders
- Care order in respect of Faith
- Placement order authorising placement for adoption
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment