T (A Child : fact finding) [2014] EWFC B115 (12 September 2014)
The court found that, on the balance of probabilities, the cause of T's subdural haemorrhages was unknown and not non-accidental injury. The expert evidence did not support a finding of inflicted trauma in the absence of corroborating evidence, and the threshold for a care order under s 31(2) Children Act 1989 was not met.
- Citation
- [2014] EWFC B115
- Parties
- Mother: TM; Father: TC; Maternal Grandparent: JM; Maternal Grandparent: MM; Applicant: Local Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Element of Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for care order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Non Accidental Injury, Threshold Criteria, Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TM
Mother
TC
Father
JM
Maternal Grandparent
MM
Maternal Grandparent
Local Authority
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Element of Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the injuries to child T were caused by non-accidental injury or unknown aetiology
- 2 Whether the threshold for a care order under s 31(2) Children Act 1989 is met
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, on the balance of probabilities, the cause of T's subdural haemorrhages was unknown and not non-accidental injury. The expert evidence did not support a finding of inflicted trauma in the absence of corroborating evidence, and the threshold for a care order under s 31(2) Children Act 1989 was not met.
Court Disposition
Application for care order dismissed
Orders
- Local authority's application for a care order is dismissed
- Parents and maternal grandmother are exonerated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment