T (No.2) (Care Proceedings: Fact-Finding: Genital Injuries: Supplemental Judgment for Publication) [2021] EWFC 101 (08 December 2021)
T's genital and anal injuries were inflicted by one or both of two possible individuals caring for him at the relevant time. The injuries were caused by inappropriate and excessive force, with the anal injuries resulting from a penetrative act or attempted penetration. The evidence established that these injuries...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] EWFC 101
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; First Respondent: Mother of T; Second Respondent: Father of T; Third Respondent: Third Respondent; First Intervener: First Intervener; Second Intervener: Second Intervener; Third Intervener: Third Intervener
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Supplemental Judgment for Publication Following Fact Finding
- Outcome
- Findings of fact made; injuries to T were inflicted and resulted from sexual or physical assault; supplemental judgment for publication; recommendation for safeguarding review.
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Fact Finding, Child Sexual Abuse, Physical Abuse, Medical Evidence, Safeguarding Procedures
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
Mother of T
First Respondent
Father of T
Second Respondent
Third Respondent
Third Respondent
First Intervener
First Intervener
Second Intervener
Second Intervener
Third Intervener
Third Intervener
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Supplemental Judgment for Publication Following Fact Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether T's injuries were inflicted and by whom
- 2 Whether T's genital and anal injuries were caused by sexual or physical assault
- 3 Adequacy and timeliness of medical and safeguarding response
Ratio Decidendi
T's genital and anal injuries were inflicted by one or both of two possible individuals caring for him at the relevant time. The injuries were caused by inappropriate and excessive force, with the anal injuries resulting from a penetrative act or attempted penetration. The evidence established that these injuries were inflicted, either as a sexual assault or a physical assault without sexual motivation. The medical and safeguarding response was delayed and inadequate, resulting in lost opportunities for forensic evidence and perpetrator identification.
Court Disposition
Findings of fact made; injuries to T were inflicted and resulted from sexual or physical assault; supplemental judgment for publication; recommendation for safeguarding review.
Orders
- Judgment to be disclosed to child protection leads in relevant agencies for safeguarding learning.
- Recommendation for referral for rapid review pursuant to Working Together 2018 and consideration of safeguarding practice review.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment