Local Authority A v ZZ [2023] EWCOP 61 (01 August 2023)
Peter has capacity to consent to sexual relations, to marry, to decide where to live (within available care settings), and to manage his property and affairs (with support). He lacks capacity to decide on his care, use of social media/internet, and contact with others (including Jenny and his mother) due to inability to understand or mitigate risks he poses. Inability to control sexual urges does not equate to incapacity under the Mental Capacity Act.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCOP 61
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority A; Respondent: Peter (ZZ); Interested Party: Jenny (JX)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Mental Capacity / Judgment on Capacity Determination
- Outcome
- Declarations as to capacity granted in specified domains; further orders to be discussed with parties.
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Consent to Sexual Relations, Capacity to Marry, Capacity to Decide Residence, Capacity to Manage Property and Affairs, Capacity to Use Social Media/internet, Capacity to Decide Contact, Capacity to Use Contraception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority A
Applicant
Peter (ZZ)
Respondent
Jenny (JX)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Mental Capacity / Judgment on Capacity Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Peter has capacity to make decisions regarding sexual relations, marriage, residence, contact, use of contraception, property and affairs, use of social media/internet, and sharing of offending information.
Ratio Decidendi
Peter has capacity to consent to sexual relations, to marry, to decide where to live (within available care settings), and to manage his property and affairs (with support). He lacks capacity to decide on his care, use of social media/internet, and contact with others (including Jenny and his mother) due to inability to understand or mitigate risks he poses. Inability to control sexual urges does not equate to incapacity under the Mental Capacity Act.
Court Disposition
Declarations as to capacity granted in specified domains; further orders to be discussed with parties.
Orders
- Declaration that Peter lacks capacity to decide on care, use of social media/internet, and contact with others (including Jenny and his mother).
- Declaration that Peter has capacity to consent to sexual relations, to marry, to decide where to live (within available care settings), and to manage his property and affairs (with support).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment