W (Adoption: Contact), Re
It is in A’s best interests throughout her life to remain with the prospective adopters, with whom she has formed secure attachments and received high-quality care. The trauma and risk of long-term harm from removal outweigh the potential benefits of placement with the birth family. Adoption is necessary and proportionate to meet A’s welfare needs, and the mother’s consent is dispensed with. Direct contact with the birth family is in A’s interests but should be by agreement, not by court order.
- Parties
- Prospective Adopters: Mr. and Mrs. X; Applicants for Special Guardianship Order: Paternal Grandparents; Respondent: Local Authority; Children's Guardian: Children’s Guardian (Ms. Janice Jolley)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Applications for Adoption and Special Guardianship / Judgment After Rehearing on Remittal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X; Special Guardianship Order application by paternal grandparents refused; mother’s consent to adoption dispensed with; no contact order made but direct contact to occur by agreement.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Special Guardianship, Child Welfare, Contact Arrangements, Dispensation of Parental Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. and Mrs. X
Prospective Adopters
Paternal Grandparents
Applicants for Special Guardianship Order
Local Authority
Respondent
Children’s Guardian (Ms. Janice Jolley)
Children's Guardian
Procedural Posture
Cross Applications for Adoption and Special Guardianship / Judgment After Rehearing on Remittal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an adoption order or a special guardianship order is in the best interests of the child A throughout her life
- 2 Whether the consent of the mother should be dispensed with for the adoption order
- 3 Whether and what form of contact with the birth family should be ordered post-adoption
Ratio Decidendi
It is in A’s best interests throughout her life to remain with the prospective adopters, with whom she has formed secure attachments and received high-quality care. The trauma and risk of long-term harm from removal outweigh the potential benefits of placement with the birth family. Adoption is necessary and proportionate to meet A’s welfare needs, and the mother’s consent is dispensed with. Direct contact with the birth family is in A’s interests but should be by agreement, not by court order.
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X; Special Guardianship Order application by paternal grandparents refused; mother’s consent to adoption dispensed with; no contact order made but direct contact to occur by agreement.
Orders
- Adoption order made in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X for child A
- Consent of the mother to adoption dispensed with
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment