E (a child), Re [2015] EWFC B119 (22 July 2015)
On the balance of probabilities, E's injuries were caused by non-accidental trauma, most likely shaking, and neither parent can be excluded from the pool of possible perpetrators. The state of the family home at the relevant time also satisfies threshold criteria for intervention.
- Citation
- [2015] EWFC B119
- Parties
- Mother: K; Father: D; Maternal Grandmother: J; Applicant: Local Authority; Guardian: Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Findings made that E suffered non-accidental injuries and threshold criteria are satisfied; neither parent excluded from pool of possible perpetrators.
- Legal Topics
- Non Accidental Injury, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Identification of Perpetrator, Threshold Criteria, Parental Responsibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K
Mother
D
Father
J
Maternal Grandmother
Local Authority
Applicant
Guardian
Guardian
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether E's injuries were accidental or non-accidental
- 2 If non-accidental, who was responsible
- 3 Whether parents provided a truthful account
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, E's injuries were caused by non-accidental trauma, most likely shaking, and neither parent can be excluded from the pool of possible perpetrators. The state of the family home at the relevant time also satisfies threshold criteria for intervention.
Court Disposition
Findings made that E suffered non-accidental injuries and threshold criteria are satisfied; neither parent excluded from pool of possible perpetrators.
Orders
- E to remain in foster care pending further welfare determination
- Regular supervised contact for parents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment