P, Re (Application for Secure Accommodation Order)
The court retains jurisdiction to make secure accommodation orders under s.25 Children Act 1989 for children aged 16-18 accommodated under s.20(3), as the restriction in regulation 5(2) applies only to s.20(5) and not s.20(3).
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; Child/respondent: P; Interested Party: Mother of P
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Secure Accommodation Order / Ruling on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application for secure accommodation order adjourned generally with liberty to restore.
- Legal Topics
- Secure Accommodation Orders, Children Act 1989, Mental Health Act 1983, Jurisdiction for Children Over 16, Regulations on Secure Accommodation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
P
Child/respondent
Mother of P
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Secure Accommodation Order / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the court have jurisdiction to make a secure accommodation order under s.25 Children Act 1989 for a child over 16 accommodated under s.20(3)?
- 2 Does regulation 5(2) of the Children (Secure Accommodation) Regulations 1991 bar such orders for children accommodated under s.20(3)?
Ratio Decidendi
The court retains jurisdiction to make secure accommodation orders under s.25 Children Act 1989 for children aged 16-18 accommodated under s.20(3), as the restriction in regulation 5(2) applies only to s.20(5) and not s.20(3).
Court Disposition
Application for secure accommodation order adjourned generally with liberty to restore.
Orders
- Local authority's application for secure accommodation order adjourned generally with liberty to restore should circumstances arise in which it considers it appropriate to do so.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment