A (A Child), Re [2009] EWCC 3 (Fam) (2009)

A (A Child), Re [2009] EWCC 3 (Fam) (2009)

The court found that the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were satisfied due to the mother's severe learning disability and inability to care for the child, the father's unwillingness to provide full-time care, and the absence of alternative family carers. The child was likely to suffer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] EWCC 3 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant: Local Authority; Respondent: A (a child); Respondent: Mother (represented by Official Solicitor); Respondent: Father; Interested Party: Husband (mother's husband)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Final Order at Issues Resolution Hearing
Outcome
Final care order made in favour of the local authority.
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Parental Responsibility, Threshold Criteria, Adoption, Welfare of the Child, Human Rights (articles 6 and 8 Echr)
Family Law Child Protection Care Orders Parental Responsibility Threshold Criteria Adoption Welfare of the Child Human Rights (articles 6 and 8 Echr)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Local Authority

Applicant

A (a child)

Respondent

Mother (represented by Official Solicitor)

Respondent

Father

Respondent

Husband (mother's husband)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Final Order at Issues Resolution Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 are met for making a care order
  2. 2 Whether the child’s welfare requires a care order and placement for adoption
  3. 3 Whether the parents or family members are able to care for the child

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were satisfied due to the mother's severe learning disability and inability to care for the child, the father's unwillingness to provide full-time care, and the absence of alternative family carers. The child was likely to suffer significant harm without intervention. A care order was necessary and proportionate to safeguard the child's welfare, with a view to future adoption.

Court Disposition

Final care order made in favour of the local authority.

Orders

  • Care order in respect of the child in favour of the local authority.
  • No order for costs between the parties.