A Local Authority v P & Anor (Rev 1) [2015] EWCOP B2 (16 November 2015)
The court found that CMS had breached the court orders on 15 occasions based on a combination of direct and sufficiently weighty hearsay evidence, and that the breaches were frequent, deliberate, and to the detriment of a vulnerable person. Given the failure of previous sanctions, an immediate custodial sentence was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCOP B2
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; Respondent: CMS; Subject: P
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Committal Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing of Evidence on Alleged Breaches of Court Orders
- Outcome
- CMS found in contempt of court for 15 breaches; immediate custodial sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunction, Committal for Contempt, Hearsay Evidence, Vulnerable Adults
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
CMS
Respondent
P
Subject
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Committal Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing of Evidence on Alleged Breaches of Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CMS breached court orders prohibiting attendance at P's property
- 2 Whether hearsay evidence is sufficient to prove breaches to the criminal standard
- 3 Appropriate sentence for proven breaches
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that CMS had breached the court orders on 15 occasions based on a combination of direct and sufficiently weighty hearsay evidence, and that the breaches were frequent, deliberate, and to the detriment of a vulnerable person. Given the failure of previous sanctions, an immediate custodial sentence was the only appropriate response.
Court Disposition
CMS found in contempt of court for 15 breaches; immediate custodial sentence imposed.
Orders
- Six months' imprisonment for breaches 1 to 5 and six months' imprisonment for breaches 6 to 21, to be served concurrently.
- Suspended committal order not activated; matter adjourned for formal drawing of committal order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment