X (A child : care order) [2017] EWFC B84 (13 October 2017)
The threshold for a care order was met due to the mother's drug misuse, chaotic lifestyle, and inability to provide safe and consistent care. Placement with Y and her husband under a care order is necessary, proportionate, and in X's best interests, as no less interventionist order would suffice.
- Citation
- [2017] EWFC B84
- Parties
- Applicant: Local Authority; Respondent: M; Intervener: Y
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- care order granted; placement order application withdrawn
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Child Welfare, Parental Responsibility, Placement With Family, Threshold Criteria
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Local Authority
Applicant
M
Respondent
Y
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold for a care order under the Children Act 1989 is met
- 2 Whether X should be placed with Y under a care order or be considered for adoption
- 3 Whether the care plan for X is proportionate and in her best interests
Ratio Decidendi
The threshold for a care order was met due to the mother's drug misuse, chaotic lifestyle, and inability to provide safe and consistent care. Placement with Y and her husband under a care order is necessary, proportionate, and in X's best interests, as no less interventionist order would suffice.
Court Disposition
care order granted; placement order application withdrawn
Orders
- Care order made placing X with Y and her husband
- Leave granted to local authority to withdraw application for placement order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment