X (A child : care order) [2017] EWFC B84 (13 October 2017)

X (A child : care order) [2017] EWFC B84 (13 October 2017)

The threshold for a care order was met due to the mother's drug misuse, chaotic lifestyle, and inability to provide safe and consistent care. Placement with Y and her husband under a care order is necessary, proportionate, and in X's best interests, as no less interventionist order would suffice.

Citation
[2017] EWFC B84
Parties
Applicant: Local Authority; Respondent: M; Intervener: Y
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
care order granted; placement order application withdrawn
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Child Welfare, Parental Responsibility, Placement With Family, Threshold Criteria

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Local Authority

Applicant

M

Respondent

Y

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the threshold for a care order under the Children Act 1989 is met
  2. 2 Whether X should be placed with Y under a care order or be considered for adoption
  3. 3 Whether the care plan for X is proportionate and in her best interests

Ratio Decidendi

The threshold for a care order was met due to the mother's drug misuse, chaotic lifestyle, and inability to provide safe and consistent care. Placement with Y and her husband under a care order is necessary, proportionate, and in X's best interests, as no less interventionist order would suffice.

Court Disposition

care order granted; placement order application withdrawn

Orders

  • Care order made placing X with Y and her husband
  • Leave granted to local authority to withdraw application for placement order