Tech 21 UK Ltd v Logitech Europe SA [2015] EWHC 2614 (Ch) (15 September 2015)
The English court has no jurisdiction to hear the claim for a declaration of non-infringement of Community unregistered design right against Logitech, as such claims must be brought in the courts of the Member State where the defendant is domiciled or has an establishment (here, the Netherlands or Croatia). However, the English court does have jurisdiction to hear the claim for groundless threats under the UK Community Design Regulations 2005, as the letter from Logitech would be understood by a reasonable recipient, with legal advice, as threatening UK proceedings, and the Lugano Convention applies to such statutory tort claims.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 2614 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tech 21 UK Limited; Defendant: Logitech Europe S. A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (intellectual Property) / Jurisdictional Challenge (interlocutory Application)
- Outcome
- Jurisdiction declined for declaration of non-infringement; jurisdiction affirmed for groundless threats claim.
- Legal Topics
- Community Unregistered Design Right, Jurisdiction Under EC Designs Regulation, Groundless Threats of Infringement Proceedings, Interpretation of Lugano Convention, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tech 21 UK Limited
Claimant
Logitech Europe S. A.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (intellectual Property) / Jurisdictional Challenge (interlocutory Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the English court have jurisdiction to hear a claim for a declaration of non-infringement of Community unregistered design right against a Swiss defendant with EU establishments?
- 2 Does the English court have jurisdiction to hear a claim for groundless threats under the UK Community Design Regulations 2005?
- 3 Does a letter from Logitech constitute a threat of UK proceedings under the statutory test?
Ratio Decidendi
The English court has no jurisdiction to hear the claim for a declaration of non-infringement of Community unregistered design right against Logitech, as such claims must be brought in the courts of the Member State where the defendant is domiciled or has an establishment (here, the Netherlands or Croatia). However, the English court does have jurisdiction to hear the claim for groundless threats under the UK Community Design Regulations 2005, as the letter from Logitech would be understood by a reasonable recipient, with legal advice, as threatening UK proceedings, and the Lugano Convention applies to such statutory tort claims.
Court Disposition
Jurisdiction declined for declaration of non-infringement; jurisdiction affirmed for groundless threats claim.
Orders
- Claim for declaration of non-infringement of Community unregistered design right dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Claim for groundless threats under UK Community Design Regulations 2005 may proceed in the English court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment