Air Studios (Lyndhurst) Ltd (t/a Air Entertainment Group) v Lombard North Central Plc [2012] EWHC 3162 (QB) (09 November 2012)
A binding contract was concluded by email on 19 August 2011 when Lombard accepted Air Studios' unconditional offer to purchase all equipment under the three lease agreements for £100,000 plus VAT, on an 'as is, where is' basis, with removal at Air Studios' risk and expense. The contract was not void for uncertainty as the subject matter and price were sufficiently certain, and the absence of agreed standard terms or further formalities did not prevent contract formation.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3162
- Parties
- Claimant: Air Studios (Lyndhurst) Limited T/A Air Entertainment Group; Defendant: Lombard North Central PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant on liability; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Certainty of Terms, Repudiation, Measure of Damages, Sale of Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Air Studios (Lyndhurst) Limited T/A Air Entertainment Group
Claimant
Lombard North Central PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract was concluded by email on 19 August 2011 for the sale of equipment
- 2 Whether the contract was void for uncertainty
- 3 What were the terms of any contract concluded
Ratio Decidendi
A binding contract was concluded by email on 19 August 2011 when Lombard accepted Air Studios' unconditional offer to purchase all equipment under the three lease agreements for £100,000 plus VAT, on an 'as is, where is' basis, with removal at Air Studios' risk and expense. The contract was not void for uncertainty as the subject matter and price were sufficiently certain, and the absence of agreed standard terms or further formalities did not prevent contract formation.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant on liability; damages awarded.
Orders
- Declaration that a binding contract was concluded on 19 August 2011 for the sale of all equipment under the three lease agreements for £100,000 plus VAT.
- Damages to be assessed based on the difference between the contract price and the cost of equivalent second-hand equipment (£40,735).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment