Metro Construction Ltd. v London Borough of Barnet
The designation of the site as a conservation area was unlawful because its true purpose was solely to prevent demolition of the unlisted monastery building, not to preserve or enhance an area of special architectural or historic interest; the site did not independently qualify as a conservation area under the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Metro Construction Limited; Defendant: London Borough of Barnet
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; designation quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Conservation Area Designation, Judicial Review, Planning (listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Local Authority Powers, Heritage Protection
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Metro Construction Limited
Claimant
London Borough of Barnet
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the designation of 119 Bridge Lane as a Conservation Area was lawful under s.69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
- 2 Whether the designation was improperly motivated solely to prevent demolition of an unlisted building
- 3 Whether the area designated met the statutory criteria for a conservation area
Ratio Decidendi
The designation of the site as a conservation area was unlawful because its true purpose was solely to prevent demolition of the unlisted monastery building, not to preserve or enhance an area of special architectural or historic interest; the site did not independently qualify as a conservation area under the statutory criteria.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; designation quashed.
Orders
- The designation of 119 Bridge Lane as a Conservation Area is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment