O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey & Anor
Responsibility for accommodating asylum-seeking families with minor children lies exclusively with NASS under section 122 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; section 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948 does not confer power or duty on local authorities to accommodate minor children, and section 17 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Queen on the application of 'O'; Defendant: London Borough of Haringey; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Support, Local Authority Duties, Accommodation for Asylum Seekers, Children's Welfare, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the application of 'O'
Claimant
London Borough of Haringey
Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether local authority has power or duty to accommodate minor children of an asylum-seeker under section 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948
- 2 Whether responsibility for accommodation and support lies with local authority or NASS (National Asylum Support Service)
- 3 Interpretation of statutory provisions regarding support for asylum-seeking families with children
Ratio Decidendi
Responsibility for accommodating asylum-seeking families with minor children lies exclusively with NASS under section 122 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; section 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948 does not confer power or duty on local authorities to accommodate minor children, and section 17 of the Children Act 1989 is excluded by section 122 when NASS is responsible.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Costs awarded to defendant against claimant and interested party, subject to Legal Aid proviso
- Permission to appeal granted to claimant and interested party
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment