Amber Construction Services Ltd v London Interspace HG Ltd
The court exercised its discretion to award costs above the fixed amount because the Defendant's conduct indicated an intention to defend, the Claimant followed proper procedure, and it would be unfair to limit costs to the fixed sum in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Amber Construction Services Limited; Defendant: London Interspace HG Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction/adjudication Enforcement) / Costs Determination After Admission of Claim
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded assessed costs above fixed amount
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Fixed Costs, Summary Judgment, Costs Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amber Construction Services Limited
Claimant
London Interspace HG Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction/adjudication Enforcement) / Costs Determination After Admission of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether only fixed costs are payable when the defendant admits or pays the sum claimed shortly after issue and before Acknowledgement of Service
- 2 Whether the court should exercise discretion to award higher costs than the fixed amount under CPR 45
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to award costs above the fixed amount because the Defendant's conduct indicated an intention to defend, the Claimant followed proper procedure, and it would be unfair to limit costs to the fixed sum in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded assessed costs above fixed amount
Orders
- Claimant awarded £6,162.00 in costs by summary assessment
- Claimant's solicitors to draw up the order and submit to the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment