AirX Jet Support Ltd & Anor v London Jet Centre (Stanstead) Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 2628 (Ch) (14 October 2025)

AirX Jet Support Ltd & Anor v London Jet Centre (Stanstead) Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 2628 (Ch) (14 October 2025)

There is a serious issue to be tried regarding the Defendants' obligations to repair the roof and provide heating. However, due to factual uncertainty about the current state of the roof and the effectiveness of proposed repairs, an interim mandatory injunction for roof repairs is not granted; instead, a joint inspection by an independent expert is ordered. For heating, a mandatory order is justified, requiring Defendants to use best endeavours to restore gas-powered heating, but not to maintain a specific temperature.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 2628 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: AirX Jet Support Limited; Claimant: AirX Charter Limited; Defendant: London Jet Centre (Stanstead) Limited; Defendant: Diamond Hangar Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Interim Application for Mandatory Injunction / Post Hearing Judgment
Outcome
Application granted in part
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Repairing Obligations, Heating Obligations, Expert Evidence, EASA Accreditation
Property Law Contract Law Landlord and Tenant Interim Injunctions Repairing Obligations Heating Obligations Expert Evidence EASA Accreditation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AirX Jet Support Limited

Claimant

AirX Charter Limited

Claimant

London Jet Centre (Stanstead) Limited

Defendant

Diamond Hangar Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interim Application for Mandatory Injunction / Post Hearing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Defendants are obliged to repair the roof of the Hangar
  2. 2 Whether Defendants are obliged to provide adequate heating to the Hangar
  3. 3 Admissibility and weight of expert evidence

Ratio Decidendi

There is a serious issue to be tried regarding the Defendants' obligations to repair the roof and provide heating. However, due to factual uncertainty about the current state of the roof and the effectiveness of proposed repairs, an interim mandatory injunction for roof repairs is not granted; instead, a joint inspection by an independent expert is ordered. For heating, a mandatory order is justified, requiring Defendants to use best endeavours to restore gas-powered heating, but not to maintain a specific temperature.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part

Orders

  • Joint inspection of Hangar roof by independent expert instructed by both parties
  • Defendants to use best endeavours to restore gas-powered heating to the Hangar