Aston FFI (Suisse) SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
The contract did not require the first surveyor to be GAFTA-approved, nor did it exclude the buyer’s independent right to reject goods for non-conformity absent a contractually compliant certificate; the Board erred in law by ignoring the totality of evidence and by imposing requirements not stipulated in the contract.
- Parties
- Claimant: Aston FFI (Suisse) SA; Defendant: Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.69 / Judgment on Appeal From GAFTA Board of Appeal
- Outcome
- Award set aside; matter remitted to Board of Appeal for reconsideration in light of judgment.
- Legal Topics
- FOB Contracts, Right of Rejection, Contractual Compliance, Documentary Requirements, GAFTA Rules, Incorporation of Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aston FFI (Suisse) SA
Claimant
Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.69 / Judgment on Appeal From GAFTA Board of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an FOB Buyer can only reject goods in reliance on a certificate complying with documentary requirements in payment terms
- 2 Whether the Board of Appeal was wrong in law to ignore the totality of evidence on contractual compliance
Ratio Decidendi
The contract did not require the first surveyor to be GAFTA-approved, nor did it exclude the buyer’s independent right to reject goods for non-conformity absent a contractually compliant certificate; the Board erred in law by ignoring the totality of evidence and by imposing requirements not stipulated in the contract.
Court Disposition
Award set aside; matter remitted to Board of Appeal for reconsideration in light of judgment.
Orders
- Award of GAFTA Board of Appeal No. 4342 dated 23rd April 2014 set aside.
- Matter remitted to Board of Appeal to consider entitlement to reject cargo based on totality of evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment