Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP
The contract did not contain a demurrage time bar clause. The first settlement agreement was not void or voidable for unilateral mistake as the mistake was not as to a contract term. However, an oral agreement was reached on 19 March 2007 for the correct demurrage sum, which superseded the prior agreement. Statoil is entitled to the balance of demurrage claimed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Statoil A.S.A.; Defendant: Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Demurrage, Unilateral Mistake, Contract Formation, Time Bar Clauses, Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Statoil A.S.A.
Claimant
Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contract contained a demurrage time bar clause
- 2 Whether the first settlement agreement was void or voidable for unilateral mistake
- 3 Whether an oral agreement was reached on 19 March 2007 superseding the prior settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The contract did not contain a demurrage time bar clause. The first settlement agreement was not void or voidable for unilateral mistake as the mistake was not as to a contract term. However, an oral agreement was reached on 19 March 2007 for the correct demurrage sum, which superseded the prior agreement. Statoil is entitled to the balance of demurrage claimed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Judgment for Statoil for US$435,833.12 as balance of demurrage
- Further argument to be heard on interest if required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment