Thomas Cook Tour Operations Ltd & Anor v Louis Hotels SA [2013] EWHC 2469 (QB) (09 August 2013)
The Greek court's refusal of interim relief does not preclude the English court from granting summary judgment or interim payment, as the Greek decision concerned only interim relief and not the substantive claim. The evidence supports that the claimants incurred substantial losses, justifying the interim payment. The defendant is not precluded from raising causation arguments at the damages assessment stage, subject to the terms of the contract.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 2469 (QB)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Thomas Cook Tour Operations Ltd; Second Claimant: Tourmajor Limited; Defendant: Louis Hotels S.A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/commercial) / Supplemental Judgment Following Application for Reconsideration After Summary Judgment and Interim Payment Order
- Outcome
- Application for reconsideration refused; previous summary judgment and interim payment order stand.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Interim Payment, Recognition of Foreign Judgments, Interim Relief, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Cook Tour Operations Ltd
First Claimant
Tourmajor Limited
Second Claimant
Louis Hotels S.A
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/commercial) / Supplemental Judgment Following Application for Reconsideration After Summary Judgment and Interim Payment Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Greek court's refusal of interim relief precludes summary judgment or interim payment in England
- 2 Whether the invoices and documents support the claimants' financial loss claim
- 3 Whether the defendant is precluded from raising causation arguments at damages assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The Greek court's refusal of interim relief does not preclude the English court from granting summary judgment or interim payment, as the Greek decision concerned only interim relief and not the substantive claim. The evidence supports that the claimants incurred substantial losses, justifying the interim payment. The defendant is not precluded from raising causation arguments at the damages assessment stage, subject to the terms of the contract.
Court Disposition
Application for reconsideration refused; previous summary judgment and interim payment order stand.
Orders
- Summary judgment for claimants stands
- Interim payment of £1 million to claimants stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment