Simmonds v Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that the employer acted reasonably and lawfully in dismissing the appellant after all reasonable steps to resolve the working relationship had failed, and that there was no error of law or perversity in its decision. The Tribunal's findings on disability and the fairness of the hearing were also within its discretion and supported by evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Louise Simmonds; Respondent: Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Reasonable Adjustments, Section 15 Equality Act 2010, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louise Simmonds
Appellant
Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the appellant constituted disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments for the appellant's disability
- 3 Whether the dismissal was unfair under employment law
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that the employer acted reasonably and lawfully in dismissing the appellant after all reasonable steps to resolve the working relationship had failed, and that there was no error of law or perversity in its decision. The Tribunal's findings on disability and the fairness of the hearing were also within its discretion and supported by evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment