LP v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor (CSM)
The First-tier Tribunal erred in law by focusing on hours and nights, failing to make findings on practical care, and treating overnight care as determinative; the correct approach requires a broad, evidence-based evaluation of practical care provided by each parent.
- Parties
- Appellant: LP; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Second Respondent: EM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for rehearing by a new tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Child Support, Shared Care, Maintenance Liability, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LP
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
First Respondent
EM
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether one parent provides day to day care to a lesser extent than the other under regulation 50(2) of the Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012
- 2 Proper approach to evaluating 'day to day care' in shared care cases
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal erred in law by focusing on hours and nights, failing to make findings on practical care, and treating overnight care as determinative; the correct approach requires a broad, evidence-based evaluation of practical care provided by each parent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for rehearing by a new tribunal.
Orders
- Case remitted to First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at oral hearing in accordance with guidance set out in this decision.
- New tribunal judge required; previous judge excluded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment