LS v AS
The children face a grave risk of serious harm, primarily emotional but also physical, if returned to Hungary due to entrenched domestic violence and ineffective protective measures. Their objections are rational, strongly held, and authentically expressed. The combination of grave risk and the children's wishes outweighs the principles of international comity and swift return under the Hague Convention.
- Parties
- Applicant: LS; Respondent: AS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Judgment on Application for Summary Return
- Outcome
- Application for summary return declined
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Summary Return, Grave Risk of Harm, Children's Objections, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LS
Applicant
AS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Judgment on Application for Summary Return
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the children should be summarily returned to Hungary under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether Article 13(b) grave risk of harm exception applies
- 3 Whether the children's objections are rational, strong, and genuinely held
Ratio Decidendi
The children face a grave risk of serious harm, primarily emotional but also physical, if returned to Hungary due to entrenched domestic violence and ineffective protective measures. Their objections are rational, strongly held, and authentically expressed. The combination of grave risk and the children's wishes outweighs the principles of international comity and swift return under the Hague Convention.
Court Disposition
Application for summary return declined
Orders
- Father's application for summary return of the children to Hungary is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment