Roberts & Anor v Fresco
A claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 by a surviving spouse does not survive the death of the applicant; it is a personal right and not a cause of action unless an order is made before death. The application to amend the claim form to enable the estate to bring such a claim stands no real prospect of success and is dismissed. However, the claim to vary the nuptial settlement for the benefit of the First Claimant as a child treated by the deceased as a child of the family has sufficient prospects and is allowed.
- Parties
- First Claimant: Laurel Marilyn Roberts; Second Claimant: Francesca Milbour; Defendant: Luanne Fresco
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Issue and Application to Amend Claim
- Outcome
- Application to amend claim to bring deceased spouse's claim dismissed; application to amend claim to vary nuptial settlement allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance Act Claims, Survival of Claims After Death, Variation of Nuptial Settlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laurel Marilyn Roberts
First Claimant
Francesca Milbour
Second Claimant
Luanne Fresco
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Issue and Application to Amend Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a potential Inheritance Act claim by a surviving spouse abate on the death of the spouse?
- 2 Can the estate of a deceased spouse bring a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975?
- 3 Does the court have power to vary a nuptial settlement for the benefit of a child or dependant under section 2(1)(f) of the 1975 Act?
Ratio Decidendi
A claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 by a surviving spouse does not survive the death of the applicant; it is a personal right and not a cause of action unless an order is made before death. The application to amend the claim form to enable the estate to bring such a claim stands no real prospect of success and is dismissed. However, the claim to vary the nuptial settlement for the benefit of the First Claimant as a child treated by the deceased as a child of the family has sufficient prospects and is allowed.
Court Disposition
Application to amend claim to bring deceased spouse's claim dismissed; application to amend claim to vary nuptial settlement allowed.
Orders
- No proceedings permitted by the estate of Mr Milbour under the 1975 Act.
- Amendment allowed in respect of claim to vary nuptial settlement for benefit of First Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment