North Warwickshire Borough Council v De Abreu & Anor [2022] EWHC 1460 (QB) (12 May 2022)

North Warwickshire Borough Council v De Abreu & Anor [2022] EWHC 1460 (QB) (12 May 2022)

The defendants admitted two breaches each of the interim injunction by protesting within the prohibited buffer zone. The breaches were deliberate but at the lower end of culpability, caused little or no harm, and the defendants had already served time in custody equivalent to an 18-day sentence. No further penalty was imposed, but each defendant was ordered to pay £195 towards the claimant's costs.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 1460 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: North Warwickshire Borough Council; Defendant: Lucia Whittaker De Abreu; Defendant: Alyson Lee
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court (civil) / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
No further penalty for contempt; costs order made against each defendant.
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Contempt of Court, Protest Law, Sentencing for Breach of Injunction, Costs Orders
Civil Procedure Public Order Human Rights Interim Injunctions Contempt of Court Protest Law Sentencing for Breach of Injunction Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

North Warwickshire Borough Council

Claimant

Lucia Whittaker De Abreu

Defendant

Alyson Lee

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court (civil) / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants breached the terms of an interim injunction prohibiting protest within a buffer zone around Kingsbury Oil Terminal
  2. 2 Appropriate penalty for admitted breaches of the injunction
  3. 3 Whether to order the defendants to pay the claimant's costs

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants admitted two breaches each of the interim injunction by protesting within the prohibited buffer zone. The breaches were deliberate but at the lower end of culpability, caused little or no harm, and the defendants had already served time in custody equivalent to an 18-day sentence. No further penalty was imposed, but each defendant was ordered to pay £195 towards the claimant's costs.

Court Disposition

No further penalty for contempt; costs order made against each defendant.

Orders

  • No fine or further penalty imposed due to time served in custody.
  • Each defendant to pay £195 to the claimant by 1 June 2022 as a contribution to costs.