R v Luke Begg

R v Luke Begg

The committals were valid as the Magistrates had the power to commit under the correct statutory provisions, and the appellant is entitled to 151 days credit for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 325 of the Sentencing Act 2020.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Luke Begg
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Clarification and Sentence Alteration
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Assault by Beating, Breach of Suspended Sentence, Sentencing Procedure, Credit for Curfew
Criminal Law Sentencing Assault by Beating Breach of Suspended Sentence Sentencing Procedure Credit for Curfew

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Luke Begg

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Clarification and Sentence Alteration

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the committal to the Crown Court was valid despite recording errors
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to credit for time spent on qualifying curfew

Ratio Decidendi

The committals were valid as the Magistrates had the power to commit under the correct statutory provisions, and the appellant is entitled to 151 days credit for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 325 of the Sentencing Act 2020.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Committals to be treated as if made under the correct statutory provisions and recorded accordingly
  • Appellant to receive 151 days credit for time spent on qualifying curfew