R v Luke Daniel Timlin

R v Luke Daniel Timlin

The sentence of 15 years was justified given the applicant's significant role, duration and scale of offending, prior relevant convictions, and lack of mitigating medical evidence; no manifest excess or unjustified disparity was found.

Parties
Applicant: Luke Daniel Timlin; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs, Sentencing, Disparity of Sentence, Mitigation, Role in Criminal Enterprise
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs Sentencing Disparity of Sentence Mitigation Role in Criminal Enterprise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luke Daniel Timlin

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's role was correctly classified as significant/managerial
  3. 3 Whether health issues warranted a reduction in sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 15 years was justified given the applicant's significant role, duration and scale of offending, prior relevant convictions, and lack of mitigating medical evidence; no manifest excess or unjustified disparity was found.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed