Disley, R. v
The sentence imposed was within the judge's discretion, reflecting the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, and totality; no basis for interference except to correct the suspended sentence activation and clarify the disqualification order.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Luke Disley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for correction of suspended sentence activation and clarification of disqualification order.
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving, Drug Driving, Sentencing, Breach of Suspended Sentence, Disqualification From Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Luke Disley
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing serious injury by dangerous driving and drug driving was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the judge erred in not activating the suspended sentence for breach
- 3 Clarification of the disqualification order
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was within the judge's discretion, reflecting the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, and totality; no basis for interference except to correct the suspended sentence activation and clarify the disqualification order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for correction of suspended sentence activation and clarification of disqualification order.
Orders
- Disqualification for 3 years on count 1, extended by 12 months under section 35A Road Traffic Act 1988.
- Suspended sentence of 6 months activated, to run concurrently with 2 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment