Ibbetson, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1293 (09 August 2022)
The sentencing judge correctly applied the robbery sentencing guidelines, properly balanced aggravating and mitigating factors, and was justified in finding the applicant dangerous based on his escalating offending, use of weapons, and risk assessment. The sentence was not manifestly excessive.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Crim 1293
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Luke Ibbetson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Unlawful Wounding, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Guilty Plea Reduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Luke Ibbetson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the robbery offence at the highest culpability and harm levels under the sentencing guidelines
- 2 Whether the finding of dangerousness and imposition of an extended sentence was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly applied the robbery sentencing guidelines, properly balanced aggravating and mitigating factors, and was justified in finding the applicant dangerous based on his escalating offending, use of weapons, and risk assessment. The sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment