Robinson v Crown Prosecution Service

Robinson v Crown Prosecution Service

The absence of a precise warning about inferences from silence did not render the trial unfair or abusive, as the appellant was adequately informed and had already decided to give evidence. The judge ensured fairness, and there was no abuse of process.

Parties
Appellant: Luke Robinson; Respondent: Crown Prosecution Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Self Incrimination, Amendment of Charge, Inferences From Silence
Criminal Law Abuse of Process Fair Trial Self Incrimination Amendment of Charge Inferences From Silence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luke Robinson

Appellant

Crown Prosecution Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial on the amended information was unfair and/or an abuse of process or of the appellant's human rights
  2. 2 Whether the Crown Court should have warned or advised the appellant about his privilege against self-incrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of a precise warning about inferences from silence did not render the trial unfair or abusive, as the appellant was adequately informed and had already decided to give evidence. The judge ensured fairness, and there was no abuse of process.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed