R v Luke Ryan
The judge's summing up, including the challenged passage, did not render the trial unfair or the conviction unsafe. The directions were fair, balanced, and did not usurp the jury's function. The sentence imposed was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the applicant's role, the losses, and aggravating and mitigating factors.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Luke Ryan; Co Accused: Paul Seakens
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed applications for permission to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Trading, Money Laundering, Jury Directions, Summing Up, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Luke Ryan
Applicant
Paul Seakens
Co Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's summing up rendered the trial unfair and the conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's summing up, including the challenged passage, did not render the trial unfair or the conviction unsafe. The directions were fair, balanced, and did not usurp the jury's function. The sentence imposed was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the applicant's role, the losses, and aggravating and mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
renewed applications for permission to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal against conviction refused
- Permission to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment