Smith, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 584 (03 April 2025)
The sentencing judge did not err in principle or law in imposing a lengthy extended sentence given the gravity and depravity of the offences, the risk posed by the appellant, and the aggravating features. However, technical errors in the structuring of the extended sentence and the administrative imposition of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 584
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Luke Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Extended Sentences, Technical Sentencing Errors, Victim Surcharge
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Luke Smith
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to consider mitigation and guilty plea
- 3 Whether technical errors were made in the structuring of the extended sentence and imposition of victim surcharge
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in principle or law in imposing a lengthy extended sentence given the gravity and depravity of the offences, the risk posed by the appellant, and the aggravating features. However, technical errors in the structuring of the extended sentence and the administrative imposition of the victim surcharge required correction.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence restructured to specify extended sentence on count 3 (14 years: 9 years custodial, 5 years extended licence), with counts 6 (8 years 4 months) and 12 (2 years 8 months) consecutive; all other sentences concurrent; total custodial term 20 years, extended licence 5 years.
- Victim surcharge to be removed from the Crown Court record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment