CGM v Luton Council
The appropriate process for challenging a local authority's refusal to seek High Court authorisation for a child's deprivation of liberty is to issue habeas corpus proceedings in the Family Division, not judicial review in the Administrative Court. The claimant's application for judicial review is stayed and treated...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: CGM; Defendant: Luton Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Application on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review stayed; claim form treated as habeas corpus application; matter transferred to Family Division.
- Legal Topics
- Deprivation of Liberty, Children in Care, Judicial Review Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Article 5 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CGM
Claimant
Luton Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Application on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether NM is deprived of her liberty within the meaning of Article 5 ECHR
- 2 Whether judicial review is the appropriate remedy or habeas corpus/family court proceedings should be used
- 3 Whether the claimant has standing to bring the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate process for challenging a local authority's refusal to seek High Court authorisation for a child's deprivation of liberty is to issue habeas corpus proceedings in the Family Division, not judicial review in the Administrative Court. The claimant's application for judicial review is stayed and treated as an application for a writ of habeas corpus, and the matter is transferred to the Family Division for further determination.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review stayed; claim form treated as habeas corpus application; matter transferred to Family Division.
Orders
- Parties to file and serve affidavit evidence before next hearing on 13 April 2021.
- Interim authorisation of deprivation of NM’s liberty, if and to the extent her placement amounts to such, until next hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment