R v L'Vaion Kaleem Peniston
None of the proposed grounds of appeal are arguable; the applicant's criticisms are unparticularised, and the trial process was fair with proper directions given. There was no evidence to support diminished responsibility or procedural unfairness. The extension of time is granted, but leave to appeal is refused.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: L'vaion Kaleem Peniston
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Manslaughter, Self Defence, Diminished Responsibility, Trial Procedure, Appeal, Youth Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
L'vaion Kaleem Peniston
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the applicant's conviction for murder should be overturned
- 2 whether the applicant's trial was unfair due to alleged failures by legal representatives
- 3 whether diminished responsibility or self-defence were available defences
Ratio Decidendi
None of the proposed grounds of appeal are arguable; the applicant's criticisms are unparticularised, and the trial process was fair with proper directions given. There was no evidence to support diminished responsibility or procedural unfairness. The extension of time is granted, but leave to appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal against conviction refused
Orders
- extension of time to apply for leave to appeal granted by one day
- application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment