IBM United Kingdom Limited v LzLabs GmbH & Ors.

IBM United Kingdom Limited v LzLabs GmbH & Ors.

The court ordered proportionate disclosure of automated transcripts of all relevant recordings, restoration and disclosure of backup tapes, and further searches regarding Mr Anzani and Mr Knight. The court refused to relax CSP disclosure requirements, instead requiring reasonable keyword searches. Applications for further information and particulars were granted where necessary for clarity and case management. The application to restrain references to the Neon Proceedings was refused as premature and unjustified.

Parties
Claimant: IBM United Kingdom Limited; Defendant: LzLabs GmbH; Defendant: Winsopia Limited; Defendant: LzLabs Limited; Defendant: Mark Jonathan Cresswell; Defendant: Thilo Rockmann
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial Intellectual Property Dispute / Case Management Conference (cmc) and Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Multiple interlocutory applications determined; directions and orders made for further disclosure, further information, and case management; some applications refused.
Legal Topics
Software Copyright Infringement, Reverse Engineering, Breach of Licence Agreement, Disclosure Obligations, Limitation of Actions, Deliberate Concealment, Case Management, Proportionality in Disclosure
Intellectual Property Contract Law Civil Procedure Software Copyright Infringement Reverse Engineering Breach of Licence Agreement Disclosure Obligations Limitation of Actions +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IBM United Kingdom Limited

Claimant

LzLabs GmbH

Defendant

Winsopia Limited

Defendant

LzLabs Limited

Defendant

Mark Jonathan Cresswell

Defendant

Thilo Rockmann

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Intellectual Property Dispute / Case Management Conference (cmc) and Interlocutory Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants reverse engineered or copied IBM mainframe software in breach of licence agreements
  2. 2 Whether the defendants complied with disclosure obligations regarding audio/video recordings and backup tapes
  3. 3 Whether the claimant must relax disclosure requirements for the Cognitive Support Portal (CSP)

Ratio Decidendi

The court ordered proportionate disclosure of automated transcripts of all relevant recordings, restoration and disclosure of backup tapes, and further searches regarding Mr Anzani and Mr Knight. The court refused to relax CSP disclosure requirements, instead requiring reasonable keyword searches. Applications for further information and particulars were granted where necessary for clarity and case management. The application to restrain references to the Neon Proceedings was refused as premature and unjustified.

Court Disposition

Multiple interlocutory applications determined; directions and orders made for further disclosure, further information, and case management; some applications refused.

Orders

  • Defendants to obtain automated transcripts of all relevant audio/video recordings, apply search terms, review for privilege and relevance, and disclose responsive documents.
  • Defendants to restore and disclose 35 archived backup tapes as previously ordered.