M v F & Anor [2024] EWFC 34 (B) (14 February 2024)
Neither M nor F proved their allegations against the other to the required standard. Both parents have engaged in high conflict, failed to prioritise A's welfare, and exposed her to their acrimony. There is no justification for continued supervised contact between A and F.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 34 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: M; First Respondent: F; Second Respondent: A, through their Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Private Law Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- All allegations by both M and F not proved. Case to proceed to welfare final hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements, Fact Finding, Parental Alienation, Domestic Abuse, Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
F
First Respondent
A, through their Children's Guardian
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act Private Law Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether M's allegations against F of physical, emotional, and sexual harm, neglect, and coaching are proved
- 2 Whether F's allegations against M of alienation, emotional harm, and failure to prioritise A's welfare are proved
Ratio Decidendi
Neither M nor F proved their allegations against the other to the required standard. Both parents have engaged in high conflict, failed to prioritise A's welfare, and exposed her to their acrimony. There is no justification for continued supervised contact between A and F.
Court Disposition
All allegations by both M and F not proved. Case to proceed to welfare final hearing.
Orders
- No findings made on any of the allegations by M or F.
- No justification for continued supervised contact between A and F.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment