M v F [2024] EWFC 5 (B) (19 January 2024)
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that F subjected M to a course of abusive and harassing communication, physical abuse (including sexual touching), and coercive and controlling behaviour. F's actions were not justified by concern for A but were motivated by jealousy, a desire for control, and disregard for M's and A's welfare. M's admissions of limited physical violence were credible and contextualised as responses to sustained abuse. F's allegations of stalking, harassment, and attempted suicide by M were not proved. The findings will inform the welfare stage of proceedings regarding child arrangements and risk.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 5 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: M; First Respondent: F
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Proceedings (fact Finding Hearing) / Fact Finding Judgment Prior to Welfare Disposal
- Outcome
- Findings made against F of abusive, threatening, and coercive behaviour; findings against M limited to two incidents of physical violence contextualised as responses to abuse; F's allegations of stalking, harassment, and attempted suicide by M not proved.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Coercive and Controlling Behaviour, Fact Finding Hearings, Child Arrangements, Non Molestation Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
F
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act Proceedings (fact Finding Hearing) / Fact Finding Judgment Prior to Welfare Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether F subjected M to abusive/harassing communication or behaviour
- 2 Whether F physically abused M, including sexual touching
- 3 Whether F engaged in controlling or coercive behaviour
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that F subjected M to a course of abusive and harassing communication, physical abuse (including sexual touching), and coercive and controlling behaviour. F's actions were not justified by concern for A but were motivated by jealousy, a desire for control, and disregard for M's and A's welfare. M's admissions of limited physical violence were credible and contextualised as responses to sustained abuse. F's allegations of stalking, harassment, and attempted suicide by M were not proved. The findings will inform the welfare stage of proceedings regarding child arrangements and risk.
Court Disposition
Findings made against F of abusive, threatening, and coercive behaviour; findings against M limited to two incidents of physical violence contextualised as responses to abuse; F's allegations of stalking, harassment, and attempted suicide by M not proved.
Orders
- Case to be timetabled to welfare disposal hearing to determine child arrangements and risk.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment