M v F & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 273 (17 March 2011)
The appeal was dismissed because M failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or compelling evidence to justify withholding knowledge of BA's existence and proceedings from F; the risk asserted was speculative and insufficient to override F's fundamental rights.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 273
- Parties
- Appellant: M; 1st Respondent: F; 2nd Respondent: H (A Local Authority); 3rd Respondent: BA (By his Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Adoption, Disclosure of Proceedings, Article 6 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Appellant
F
1st Respondent
H (A Local Authority)
2nd Respondent
BA (By his Guardian)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father should be kept ignorant of the existence and proceedings relating to his legitimate child
- 2 Whether only significant physical risk justifies withholding such knowledge
- 3 Appropriate test for risk of future harm
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because M failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or compelling evidence to justify withholding knowledge of BA's existence and proceedings from F; the risk asserted was speculative and insufficient to override F's fundamental rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Declarations sought by M refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment