Secretary of State for Health, R (on the application of) v M
The Tribunal's decision was vitiated by inadequate reasoning, reliance on an unsustainable assumption regarding supervision, and failure to provide a logical risk assessment. The decision is quashed and the matter remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal to reconsider suitability.
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for Health; Defendant: M
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Statutory Appeal / Appeal From Care Standards Tribunal to High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision quashed; case remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Protection of Vulnerable Adults, Protection of Children, Professional Misconduct, Statutory Tribunals, Human Rights Act Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for Health
Claimant
M
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Statutory Appeal / Appeal From Care Standards Tribunal to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Care Standards Tribunal erred in law in allowing Miss M's appeal against inclusion on the PoVA, PoCA, and List 99 lists
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's reasoning on suitability to work with vulnerable adults and children was legally adequate
- 3 Whether the statutory scheme is compatible with the Human Rights Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was vitiated by inadequate reasoning, reliance on an unsustainable assumption regarding supervision, and failure to provide a logical risk assessment. The decision is quashed and the matter remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal to reconsider suitability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Tribunal decision quashed; case remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal.
Orders
- The decision of the Care Standards Tribunal dated 7 November 2007 is quashed.
- The case is remitted to a freshly constituted Care Standards Tribunal to reconsider Miss M's appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment